ꯕꯥꯡꯂꯥ-ꯑꯁꯃꯤꯌꯥ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯤ

{{Infobox writing system
| name=Bengali–Assamese
| altname=বাংলা-অসমীয়
| sample=18th Century Eastern Nagari Text.svg
| caption=The text, from the 18th century [[Hastividyarnava]], commissioned by [[Ahom kingdom|Ahom]] king [[Siva Singha]], says: ''sri sri mot xivo xingha moharaja''. The modern Bengali glyph "{{lang|bn|র}}" currently used for ''ra'' is used in this pre-modern Assamese/Sanskrit manuscript for ''va'', the modern form of which is "{{lang|as|ৱ}}".  Though the modern Assamese alphabet does not use this glyph for any letter, modern [[Tirhuta]] continues to use this for ''va''.
| imagesize=320px
| type=[[Abugida]]
| languages=[[Assamese language|Assamese]], [[Bengali language|Bengali]], [[Bishnupriya Manipuri language|Bishnupriya Manipuri]], [[Meitei language|Meitei]], [[Sylheti language|Sylheti]], [[Santali language|Santali]], [[Kokborok]], [[Garo language|Garo]], [[Hajong language|Hajong]], [[Chakma language|Chakma]], [[Chittagonian language|Chittagonian]], [[Maithili language|Maithili]], [[Angika language|Angika]], [[Kamtapuri language|Kamtapuri]] and others.
| time=c. 1100–present
| fam1=[[Proto-Sinaitic alphabet]] <sup>[a]</sup>
| fam2=[[Phoenician alphabet]] <sup>[a]</sup>
| fam3=[[Aramaic alphabet]] <sup>[a]</sup>
| footnotes=[a] The Semitic origin of Brahmic scripts is not universally agreed upon.<ref name="salomon-brahmi">'The theory of a Semitic origin for Brahmi, [as opposed to Indus origin], does have a strong, if not entirely conclusive, body of concrete evidence in its favor.' and 'For even many of the supporters of the Semitic hypothesis concede that, in Dani's words, "[T]he BrahmT letters are not literally 'derived' from the Semitic letters as is commonly understood, but are only based on them" (DIP 29).' {{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=29}}</ref> 
| fam4=[[Brāhmī script|Brāhmī]]<ref name="salomon-brahmi"/>
| fam5=[[Gupta script|Gupta]]<ref name="salomon-gupta">'The terminology for the various premodern Brahmi-derived scripts is, however, largely unstandardized and typically made up ad hoc, due mainly to the lack of attested indigenous terms for many of them (2.1.1). D. C. Sircar broadly categorizes the stages of development into "Early," "Middle," and "Late Brahmi" periods, corresponding (in northern India) to the third through first centuries B.C., the first century B.C. through third century A.D., and the fourth through sixth centuries A.D., respectively (HEP 113), though others refer to his "Late Brahmi" as "Gupta script".' {{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=19}}</ref>
| fam6=[[Siddhaṃ script|Siddhaṃ]]<ref name="salomon-siddham">"Around the late sixth century, the so-called Gupta script of northern India evolved into a distinct new script for which the preferred name is Siddhamatrka." {{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=39}}</ref>
| fam7=[[Gaudi script|Gaudi]]<ref name="salomon-gaudi">"In the northeast, the local derivative of Siddhamatrka was the script knownas Proto-Bengali or Gaudi, which was current from the tenth to the fourteenth centuries." {{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=41}}</ref>
| children= [[Assamese alphabet|ꯑꯁꯥꯃꯤꯁ]], [[Bengali alphabet|Bengali]], [[Anga Lipi]]
| unicode=[https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0980.pdf U+0980–U+09FF] (Bengali),<br/>[https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U11480.pdf U+011480–U+0114DF] (Tirhuta)
| iso15924=Beng}}
'''ꯕꯥꯡꯂꯥ-ꯑꯁꯃꯤꯌꯥ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ''' (ꯕꯪꯒꯥꯂꯤ-ꯑꯁꯥꯃꯤ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ) (ꯅꯣꯡꯄꯣꯛꯀꯤ ꯅꯥꯒꯔꯤ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ) (ꯕꯪꯒꯥꯂꯤ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ) (বাংলা-অসমীয় ময়েক্) ([[ꯏꯪꯂꯤꯁ]]:Bengali-Assamese script) ꯍꯥꯏꯕꯁꯤ ꯕ꯭ꯔꯥꯍꯃꯤ ꯃꯌꯦꯛꯇꯒꯤ ꯊꯪꯊꯔꯛꯄ ꯑꯅꯧꯕ ꯃꯇꯝꯒꯤ ꯅꯣꯡꯄꯣꯛ ꯂꯝꯒꯤ [[ꯃꯌꯦꯛ]]ꯅꯤ ꯫<ref>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengali-Assamese_script</ref>

==ꯁꯤꯁꯨ ꯌꯦꯡꯎ==
* [[ꯑꯥꯔꯕꯤ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ]]

==ꯃꯇꯦꯡ ꯂꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ==
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Wp/mni]]